Blog Epitaphs? Get Me Rewrite!
They don't get. They never got it. It's not "blogging for dollars" - and most of us aren't blogging for fame. We blog for the same reason we keep journals, write novels that never leave the desk drawer and mix our own CD's. We blog to express ourselves - the fact that our musings can now be easily published and widely disseminated at very low cost is ancillary. I'd keep this blog going if I never got another reader, and I daresay that 99.9% of the other bloggers out there feel the same way. Money and fame are the [potential] icing, not the cake.
Blogging differs from traditional, mainstream journalism in that it's intensely personal, in the sense that it's not driven by markets or the needs of others, but strictly by an internal need on the part of the blogger to, well, blog.
And that's not a bad thing.
'Reports of blogging's demise are bosh, but if we're lucky, something else really is going away: the by-turns overheated and uninformed obsession with blogging,' Jason Fry writes on WSJ.com, responding to a recent wave of blog-doubting that includes a Gallup poll and a Chicago Tribune editorial entitled, 'Bloggy, we hardly knew ye.' Fry says blogging might not fly as a business, but 'the failure of blogging to launch a huge number of well-heeled companies or keep attracting VC money won't mean the end of blogs -- instant messaging, for one, hasn't foundered despite the difficulty of turning its popularity into profits.'
/Technology | 4 writebacks | permanent link
On 2/27/2006 17:46:14
brainwise wrote
On 2/27/2006 21:16:24
pablo wrote
mailto:editor@roundrockjournal.com
On 2/27/2006 21:30:53
brainwise wrote
On 2/28/2006 07:10:06
Arwin wrote
Spam meets blog
comment...